Strategy added by Bruski#1762
44
44
Average rating: |
3.5 |
Ratings: |
37 |
Your vote: |
|
Creator |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tags
Filter strategies:
These options reset all other sorting filters. |
|||||||||
Any Level 25+ Pet
|
This is my first guide feel free to give me tips of how to improve the guide
|
Breed Script |
2 | 5.0 | N/A | 41 | 135
2:15
|
16+ | |
Script Staff Pick |
2 | 4.9 | N/A | 101 | 110
1:50
|
15+ | |||
I told my dad I stopped raising hell and he called me a quitter!
|
Script |
2 | 4.7 | N/A | 56 | 115
1:55
|
13+ | ||
This team & strat is part of my Emperor Crab & Soul of the Forge challenge run. I tried to use a very limited number of no super rare pets who usually survive multiple fights.
Start & Description << - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - >> Next battle |
Breed Script |
2 | 5.0 | N/A | 10 | 230
3:50
|
29+ | ||
Any Level 24+ Elemental
Any Level 24+ Beast
|
Basic strat with a commonly used pet.
TD Script included for ease and repeatability of dungeon. Please rate and like if you used this strat, and comment with any problems or suggestions! Strategy by PolarBruski |
Script |
2 | 3.5 | N/A | 44 | 95
1:35
|
12+ | |
Flayer Youngling is quite capable of soloing this fight.
|
2 | 4.6 | N/A | 8 | 135
2:15
|
17+ | |||
Any Level 25+ Elemental
|
Script |
2 | 3.9 | N/A | 5 | 140
2:20
|
18+ | ||
Any Pet
Any Pet
|
Very easy strategy. Just take a beast with damage reduction and a nice beast attack - You will avoid the stampede and will take nearly 0 damage. Make sure you have some other pet, than a beast and in the best case a pet with some elemental attacks.
You could also bring a level pet in combination with a strong elemental pet or go for a hare/rabbit. |
RNG |
2 | 4.0 | N/A | 5 | 110
1:50
|
15+ | |
Any Level 25+ Elemental
|
Script |
2 | 5.0 | N/A | 2 | 115
1:55
|
15+ | ||
Any Level 25+ Elemental
Any Level 25+ Humanoid
|
*Works only if 2 backline pets are both cockroaches*
I tried this strat randomly and it absolutely smokes all the cockroaches no problem and my Kun-Lai Runt is green quality |
2 | 0.0 | N/A | 0 | 95
1:35
|
12+ | ||
Breed Script |
2 | 0.0 | N/A | 0 | 105
1:45
|
11+ | |||
Slowest strategy I've ever made... but it worked rather well vs 2x Cockroach + Mechanic 3rd. Didn't even get beyond Hogs. YMMV.
|
Script |
2 | 0.0 | N/A | 0 | 175
2:55
|
20+ |
Incl. steps:
Any Level 24+ Elemental
Skills: Any
Breed: Any
Any Level 24+ Beast
Skills: Any
Breed: Any
Substitutes:
1 / 2
Basic strat with a commonly used pet.
TD Script included for ease and repeatability of dungeon.
Please rate and like if you used this strat, and comment with any problems or suggestions!
Strategy by PolarBruski
Before | After | Experience Gain | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | ➜ | 6 | 1196 |
2 | ➜ | 7 | 1271 |
3 | ➜ | 7 | 1337 |
4 | ➜ | 7 | 1394 |
5 | ➜ | 8 | 1444 |
6 | ➜ | 8 | 1485 |
7 | ➜ | 9 | 1518 |
8 | ➜ | 10 | 1543 |
9 | ➜ | 11 | 1559 |
10 | ➜ | 11 | 1568 |
11 | ➜ | 12 | 1568 |
12 | ➜ | 13 | 1559 |
13 | ➜ | 14 | 1543 |
14 | ➜ | 15 | 1518 |
15 | ➜ | 16 | 1485 |
16 | ➜ | 17 | 1444 |
17 | ➜ | 17 | 1394 |
18 | ➜ | 18 | 1337 |
19 | ➜ | 19 | 1271 |
20 | ➜ | 20 | 1196 |
21 | ➜ | 21 | 1114 |
22 | ➜ | 22 | 1023 |
23 | ➜ | 23 | 924 |
24 | ➜ | 24 | 817 |
Safari Hat |
|
Lesser Pet Treat |
|
Pet Treat |
|
Darkmoon Hat |
|
Pet Battle Week |
= |
Pet levels to 25 with minimal XP lost |
|
= |
Additional XP above level 25 is lost |
|
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
Pest control's here!
8
You must be logged in to vote on commentsRexkat
wrote on 2021-05-07 19:20:23
ability(Mangle:314) [ !enemy(#1).active & !enemy.aura(Mangle:313).exists]
ability(Rampage:124)
ability(Thrash:202)
ability(#1)
change(#3) [ enemy.type = 5 ]
change(next)
2
You must be logged in to vote on commentslookieitswookie
wrote on 2023-01-15 20:08:20
1
You must be logged in to vote on commentsTula#1525
wrote on 2024-02-07 17:46:54
0
You must be logged in to vote on commentsthemorrigan
wrote on 2022-03-29 09:50:41
1
You must be logged in to vote on commentsGrindlebell
wrote on 2020-12-10 06:57:36
1
You must be logged in to vote on commentsTeoDaTank
wrote on 2020-09-19 01:11:18
2
You must be logged in to vote on commentsDaniel wrote on 2019-12-06 00:07:17
2
You must be logged in to vote on commentsTeoDaTank
wrote on 2020-09-19 01:04:32
5
You must be logged in to vote on commentsCernunnas
wrote on 2019-01-31 13:28:21
1
You must be logged in to vote on comments(OP) Bruski#1762
wrote on 2019-05-05 23:44:04
1
You must be logged in to vote on commentsschlumpf#2707
wrote on 2019-01-07 18:11:28
ability(Mangle:314) [ !enemy(#1).active ]
ability(Rampage:124)
ability(Thrash:202)
ability(#1)
change(#3) [ enemy.type = 5 ]
change(next)
should do the trick.
4
You must be logged in to vote on commentsRunisco
wrote on 2019-04-21 05:46:32
ability(Mangle:314) [ !enemy(#1).active & !enemy.aura(Mangle:313).exists]
ability(Rampage:124)
ability(Thrash:202)
ability(#1)
change(#3) [ enemy.type = 5 ]
change(next)
-6
You must be logged in to vote on commentsschlumpf#2707
wrote on 2019-04-24 08:14:16
3
You must be logged in to vote on commentsRunisco
wrote on 2019-04-27 08:03:12
1
You must be logged in to vote on commentsBalder wrote on 2019-01-02 08:31:26
2
You must be logged in to vote on commentsschlumpf#2707
wrote on 2019-01-07 18:13:30
1
You must be logged in to vote on commentsArticca#2843
wrote on 2023-09-12 11:05:20
3
You must be logged in to vote on commentsАneityum
wrote on 2020-11-09 17:13:56
2
You must be logged in to vote on commentsPutin-XyuLo
wrote on 2022-07-25 20:35:32
ability(Mangle:314) [ !enemy(#1).active & !enemy.aura(Mangle:313).exists]
ability(Rampage:124)
ability(Thrash:202)
ability(#1)
change(#3) [ enemy.type = 5 ]
change(next)
Даже с этим скриптом не всегда прокатывает. (edited)
1
You must be logged in to vote on commentsNuclearsun#21119
wrote on 2020-11-03 16:16:49
New Comment: